{"id":3085,"date":"2026-09-11T08:42:01","date_gmt":"2026-09-11T08:42:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/?p=3085"},"modified":"2026-09-11T08:42:07","modified_gmt":"2026-09-11T08:42:07","slug":"the-gulfs-new-age","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/","title":{"rendered":"The Gulf\u2019s New Age<\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Gulf at a Turning Point: Pakistan and the Architecture of a New Security Order<\/strong>
\nThere are moments upon the chessboard of history when an event, seemingly modest in its immediate form, proves rather larger in consequence than the document that records it. A defence agreement may appear, at first glance, no more than another entry in the ledgers of diplomacy: a communiqu\u00e9 issued, signatures exchanged, hands shaken beneath the flags of two states. Yet widen the aperture of time, and the shadows of another age sometimes begin to gather behind such formalities.<\/p>\n

The latest defence cooperation between Pakistan and Kuwait, appearing in close proximity to what has been described as the Makkah Defence Agreement involving Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and T\u00fcrkiye, belongs to that category of events whose meaning may not be exhausted by the narrow vocabulary of bilateral relations. Taken together, these developments invite a larger question: whether the security architecture of the Gulf is entering a period in which old certainties are being revised, old dependencies qualified, and new centres of military and political gravity allowed to emerge.<\/p>\n

They are unfolding at a time when the politics of the Gulf is plainly searching for forms better suited to an altered world. The region is seeking to move beyond inherited strategic arrangements, to diversify its sources of military cooperation, and to acquire a greater measure of autonomy amid the shifting balance of global power. In such an age, security is no longer conceived solely as the shelter afforded by one great patron; increasingly, it is understood as the prudence of possessing several relationships, several capabilities and, where possible, several doors through which help may enter.<\/p>\n

Against this background, the near-contemporaneous emergence of the Pakistan\u2013Kuwait defence arrangement and the Makkah framework may reasonably be read as an indication that Pakistan\u2019s place in the Gulf security conversation is becoming more substantial. Recent regional tensions, armed confrontations and the wider uncertainty that has overtaken the Middle East have encouraged states to look beyond declarations of political sympathy towards partners capable of supplying something more concrete: military experience, training, operational knowledge and institutional competence.<\/p>\n

According to the underlying account, Pakistan has acquired a significant degree of confidence among a number of Gulf states precisely because it possesses these attributes. Its military experience, its training establishments and its accumulated defence expertise have made it a partner of practical consequence. One might say that the lamp of Gulf security, once expected to burn largely on the oil supplied by a single established power, is now being trimmed with greater care, while other hands are being invited to replenish the flame.<\/p>\n

Nor is the response from Bangladesh without significance. A statement attributed in the text to the Bangladeshi Foreign Minister treats the trilateral arrangement in a positive light and suggests that, should the present members express a desire for Bangladesh to join, Dhaka would be prepared to examine such a possibility favourably and with seriousness.<\/p>\n

That remark matters because it points beyond the immediate membership of the Makkah framework. Were such an arrangement to move beyond its present geographical confines and acquire a South Asian dimension, its political meaning would inevitably change. What may have begun as a circle drawn principally around the collective security concerns of Western Asia could, in time, become part of a much larger conversation about the strategic responsibilities and security interests of the wider Muslim world.<\/p>\n

According to the text, Pakistan and Kuwait signed a new agreement on joint defence and military cooperation during the visit to Islamabad of the Kuwaiti Defence Minister, Sheikh Abdullah Ali Abdullah Al-Sabah, on 27 August. The agreement should not be regarded as the planting of an entirely new tree. It is better understood as a further branch grown from the institutional stock established in 2023.<\/p>\n

Its declared purposes are practical rather than theatrical: closer operational coordination, the exchange of military experience, improved preparedness, wider cooperation in training and capacity-building, and greater collaboration in border management. In other words, the two states appear to be moving beyond the ceremonial language of friendship towards a relationship intended to possess a more operational character.<\/p>\n

The original framework between Pakistan and Kuwait dates from June 2023. Its purpose was to establish a legal and institutional basis for cooperation across a number of fields, among them military training, defence industries and the exchange of professional experience. The latest arrangement is presented as an attempt to bring that framework down from the altitude of principle to the harder ground of execution. The foundations, one might say, had already been laid; the present moment concerns the raising of the structure upon them.<\/p>\n

In international affairs, however, the proper question is seldom confined to what occurred. One must also ask when it occurred.<\/p>\n

The timing of the Pakistan\u2013Kuwait arrangement, following only weeks after the Makkah Defence Agreement, is therefore of legitimate analytical interest. The Gulf is passing through a period in which familiar security structures are being tested by unfamiliar pressures, while states reconsider the distribution and variety of their defence relationships. Timing, in diplomacy, is rarely an empty vessel. Yet caution remains indispensable: proximity in time is not, by itself, proof of a new military bloc, still less of some predetermined regional design.<\/p>\n

Here an essential distinction must be maintained.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Pakistan\u2013Kuwait agreement, as described in the source text, does not amount to a mutual-defence alliance under which an attack upon one state would automatically oblige the other to enter a war on its behalf. Its ambit is more limited and more practical: training, capacity-building, exchanges of expertise, and closer coordination between the armed forces of the two countries.<\/p>\n

To treat it, therefore, as synonymous with the Makkah Defence Agreement would be to place two unlike instruments upon the same scale and then wonder why the balance proves false.<\/p>\n

The Makkah arrangement, by contrast, is presented in the text as a broader framework of collective security, carrying the idea that aggression against one of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia or T\u00fcrkiye would be regarded in the context of the security of all three. That distinction is not semantic; it goes to the <\/p>\n

heart of the matter.<\/p>\n

With Kuwait, Pakistan\u2019s role is described chiefly in terms of training, professional competence and defence capacity. In the Makkah framework, as depicted by the source, the idea moves closer to shared responsibility for security itself. In the former, skill and experience are placed in common; in the latter, the very fortunes of security are imagined as more closely intertwined.<\/p>\n

The practical substance of Pakistan\u2013Kuwait cooperation lies in improving the capabilities of the Kuwaiti armed forces, providing training and creating opportunities for military exercises and professional exchange. Analysts cited in the source suggest that the relationship may broaden into further areas of cooperation. But expansion should not be mistaken for inevitability. A widening partnership does not, merely by widening, become a treaty guarantee.<\/p>\n

Diplomacy is full of open doors which lead not to a predetermined chamber but to corridors of possibility. The Pakistan\u2013Kuwait relationship, at present, appears to belong to that more measured category.<\/p>\n

Nor can the agreement properly be understood outside the larger security environment of the Gulf. The region has had to reckon with wars and proxy conflicts, maritime tensions, threats to energy infrastructure, and the continuing consequences of confrontation between the United States and Iran. These are not isolated disturbances. Together they have altered the strategic psychology of governments accustomed, for decades, to operating beneath a relatively familiar security umbrella.<\/p>\n

The conclusion now forming in many Gulf capitals appears to be that the whole edifice of security ought not to rest upon a single pillar. Diversification of defence partnerships is thus ceasing to be a temporary expedient and beginning to resemble a regional doctrine.<\/p>\n

Pakistan\u2019s military relations with the Gulf are neither novel nor episodic. For decades, Pakistan has contributed to the strengthening of defence capabilities in several Gulf states through training programmes, military advisers and the presence of professional personnel. Kuwait\u2019s present interest in deeper cooperation may therefore be seen as another use of an old reservoir of experience rather than the discovery of an entirely unfamiliar source.<\/p>\n

Pakistan offers certain characteristics which make it noteworthy in this context: established military institutions, long experience of professional training, familiarity with several forms of terrain and conflict, and the capacity to operate in difficult and varied strategic environments. These attributes lend its defence partnerships a practical value which cannot be created by rhetoric alone.<\/p>\n

The more interesting question, then, may not be whether Pakistan has somehow \u201centered\u201d the Gulf security system. Such language implies a closed chamber into which an outsider has suddenly been admitted. The better question is whether Pakistan is gradually becoming a significant connecting point within an expanding network of defence relationships stretching across the Gulf and its surrounding regions.<\/p>\n

The text itself raises this possibility while properly resisting the temptation to announce its completion. The process, if indeed such a process is under way, remains unfinished. Nor does the Pakistan\u2013Kuwait agreement furnish evidence that the Gulf states are preparing to replace their<\/p>\n

long-standing security ties with the United States. Those ties remain structurally important.<\/strong><\/p>\n

It would therefore be too simple to interpret deeper cooperation with Pakistan and T\u00fcrkiye as evidence of a straightforward Gulf retreat from Washington. The more persuasive reading is one of diversification rather than abandonment. Kuwait, according to the account before us, appears inclined not to discard its established security arrangements with the United States, but to strengthen its strategic position by adding further relationships around them.<\/p>\n

Statesmanship has always understood what seamanship teaches by necessity: no prudent vessel relies upon a single anchor when the weather is uncertain. The sea may alter its temper without warning, and no sail is granted advance knowledge of the storm.<\/p>\n

Pakistan possesses one further characteristic which may distinguish it from some other regional security partners. Even as its defence engagement with the Gulf expands, Islamabad has preserved channels of communication and political relations with Iran.<\/p>\n

This is a narrow diplomatic bridge, and not every state has the balance to cross it. Should Pakistan continue to maintain productive relations with the Gulf Arab states while preserving a working relationship with Tehran, that capacity could enhance its value as a security partner. Strategic usefulness is sometimes measured not by the enemies a state can confront, but by the adversaries with whom it can still speak.<\/p>\n

The larger issue, therefore, is becoming steadily more consequential. Can any single outside power continue to provide comprehensive security for a region as complex, contested and strategically indispensable as the Gulf? As doubts accumulate, so too does the appeal of a more diversified network of defence partnerships.<\/p>\n

Seen in that light, the Pakistan\u2013Kuwait agreement may be a small but suggestive sign of a much wider historical movement: the gradual return of regional powers to strategic spaces in which, for several decades, Western powers exercised near-exclusive influence.<\/p>\n

But the distinction between transformation and rupture must be preserved. New doors are opening; the old ones have not yet been slammed shut.<\/p>\n

The statement attributed to Bangladesh lends another dimension to the matter by associating the possible enlargement of the Makkah framework with the security of the wider Muslim community. Should that idea gain practical political support, the narrative surrounding the agreement might expand from the mutual defence concerns of three states towards a more ambitious conception of collective security.<\/p>\n

At this point, politics and civilisation begin to touch.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Within the Muslim world, the idea of collective security is not merely a question of armies, treaties and deployments. It is also a question of historical memory, political trust and the willingness of states to translate civilisational affinity into disciplined institutional responsibility. Sentiment may<\/p>\n

kindle the flame; institutions alone can keep it burning.<\/strong>
\nThe text presents the Makkah Defence Agreement not as a closed or immovable arrangement but as an evolving security framework, potentially open to countries willing to accept its principles of shared responsibility and common security interests.<\/p>\n

If such a conception were ever to acquire lasting institutional form, its true test would not lie in the number of flags gathered around a table. Alliances derive their strength not from the multiplication of emblems but from the unity of purpose behind them. Political trust, internal coherence and the willingness to bear common burdens would determine whether expansion added substance or merely ceremony.<\/p>\n

Bangladesh\u2019s possible participation would be especially significant because it could carry the framework beyond the geography of Western Asia and give it an unmistakably South Asian dimension. The source further argues that such a development might affect India\u2019s strategic calculations in its north-eastern region and alter, to some degree, the wider regional balance of power.<\/p>\n

Here, however, a firm boundary must be maintained between analysis and established fact. The consequences of any alliance depend not upon membership alone but upon the actual obligations it imposes, the military commitments it entails, the geographical priorities of its members and, above all, their political will. The text treats Bangladesh\u2019s possible inclusion as a strategic development of considerable potential consequence; it should be read precisely in that conditional sense.<\/p>\n

There are also indications in the source that other states in the region may be interested in joining the Makkah framework. Were such interest to become concrete, it would pose an important question: could the arrangement develop into a broader architecture of collective security, or would enlargement dilute the cohesion that makes a smaller grouping effective?<\/p>\n

Every alliance gains something from expansion and pays something for it. New members bring resources, geography and political weight; they also bring interests, obligations, rivalries and complications of their own.<\/p>\n

The closing portion of the source raises the possibility of eventual Bangladeshi and Iranian participation and advances the view that one future objective of Pakistani foreign policy might be to broaden the Makkah arrangement by encouraging additional regional states to join. It also speculates upon possible opposition from India and Israel and, potentially, from the United Arab Emirates.<\/p>\n

These are propositions about the future, not established facts. They belong to the realm of strategic conjecture and ought to be judged as such. In serious political writing, possibility must never be permitted to borrow the robes of certainty.<\/p>\n

Yet even conjecture may reveal the direction in which political imagination has begun to travel.
\nThe politics of the Gulf has often been written upon sand, only for the sea wind to redraw its lines. For decades the region lived beneath a comparatively stable Western security canopy. Today, more searching questions are being asked.<\/p>\n

Will the security of the coming age continue to be supplied principally by one great power, or will it be assembled from a plurality of partnerships? Will the states of the region remain primarily recipients of security fashioned elsewhere, or will they increasingly become architects of arrangements of their own? And what place might Pakistan occupy in such a construction: that of a respected trainer and military partner alone, or, over time, that of a strategic hinge around which several defence relationships may turn?<\/p>\n

The Pakistan\u2013Kuwait agreement, in its present form, is not a covenant of collective war. To describe it as such would go beyond the evidence. Yet to dismiss it as merely another routine military document may equally fail to perceive the larger landscape of which it forms a part.<\/p>\n

The Makkah Defence Agreement, meanwhile, is presented by the source in the language of a broader collective-security conception. Its future character, possible expansion and regional consequences remain dependent upon political will, institutional arrangements and the changing condition of the international system.<\/p>\n

For Pakistan, therefore, the greater test may lie not in the display of power but in the preservation of balance.<\/p>\n

It must retain the confidence of the Gulf without closing the doors of dialogue with Iran; maintain relations with long-standing partners without becoming a prisoner of inherited alignments; and cultivate new regional relationships without sacrificing the diplomatic room for manoeuvre upon which an independent foreign policy ultimately depends.<\/p>\n

In the life of nations, dignity is not created by the sword alone. There are occasions when judgement, credibility and equilibrium achieve what a thousand battalions cannot.<\/p>\n

If Pakistan can marry its military capacity to political foresight, diplomatic moderation and a reputation for dependable partnership, its growing role in the Gulf may prove to be more than a passing season in diplomacy. It may, instead, acquire the character of a durable historical trend.<\/p>\n

And in that possibility there is, for some, the echo of an older hope: that a time might come when Pakistan would no longer stand merely at the receiving end of the great decisions of international politics but would be among those whose counsel helped to shape them. What once appeared the language of distant aspiration may, in the eyes of its believers, now seem to possess a new and unexpected resonance.<\/p>\n

History, however, is a stern judge. It does not reward nations for prophecy fulfilled in words, but for responsibilities discharged in deeds. The opportunity may be present; whether it becomes destiny will depend, as it always has, upon wisdom, discipline and the uses to which power is put.<\/p>\n

Dignity in the life of nations is not born only from the edge of the sword; sometimes prudence, trust and balance can do what even a thousand armies cannot do. If Pakistan succeeds in combining its military capability with political insight, diplomatic moderation and reliable partnership in the coming era, then its emerging role in the Gulf can become a long-term historical trend instead of a temporary diplomatic season. Today, the prediction of three decades ago seems to be true that by the grace of God, the time will come when the decisions of the world will be decided through mutual consultations with Pakistan… Alhamdulillah.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Gulf at a Turning Point: Pakistan and the Architecture of a New Security Order There are moments upon the chessboard of history when an event, seemingly modest in its immediate form, proves rather larger in consequence than the document that records it. A defence agreement may appear, at first glance, no more than another …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3086,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,39,33,24,31,26,27,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles","category-featured-columns","category-important-columns","category-international-columns","category-middle-east","category-pakistan-columns","category-today-columns","category-top-articles"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Gulf\u2019s | New Age<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The time will come when the decisions of the world will be decided through mutual consultations with Pakistan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Gulf\u2019s | New Age\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The time will come when the decisions of the world will be decided through mutual consultations with Pakistan\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Bitter Truth\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-11T08:42:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-11T08:42:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-1024x509.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"509\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bitter Truth\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bitter Truth\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bitter Truth\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e31346c22b0671ebcda8fa9ebe76f7e8\"},\"headline\":\"The Gulf\u2019s New Age\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-11T08:42:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-11T08:42:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2980,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-scaled.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Articles\",\"Featured Columns\",\"Important Columns\",\"International Columns\",\"Middle East\",\"Pakistan Columns\",\"Today Columns\",\"Top Articles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Gulf\u2019s | New Age\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-scaled.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-11T08:42:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-11T08:42:07+00:00\",\"description\":\"The time will come when the decisions of the world will be decided through mutual consultations with Pakistan\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-scaled.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-scaled.png\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1273,\"caption\":\"The Gulf\u2019s New Age\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/the-gulfs-new-age\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Gulf\u2019s New Age\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bitter Truth\",\"description\":\"News, Technology, Sports, Health and more\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Bitter Truth\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/BT-Logo.3.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/BT-Logo.3.png\",\"width\":280,\"height\":153,\"caption\":\"Bitter Truth\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bittertruth.uk\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e31346c22b0671ebcda8fa9ebe76f7e8\",\"name\":\"Bitter Truth\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bitter Truth\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Gulf\u2019s | New Age","description":"The time will come when the decisions of the world will be decided through mutual consultations with Pakistan","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Gulf\u2019s | New Age","og_description":"The time will come when the decisions of the world will be decided through mutual consultations with Pakistan","og_url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/","og_site_name":"Bitter Truth","article_published_time":"2026-09-11T08:42:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-11T08:42:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":509,"url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-1024x509.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Bitter Truth","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bitter Truth","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/"},"author":{"name":"Bitter Truth","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e31346c22b0671ebcda8fa9ebe76f7e8"},"headline":"The Gulf\u2019s New Age","datePublished":"2026-09-11T08:42:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-11T08:42:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/"},"wordCount":2980,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-scaled.png","articleSection":["Articles","Featured Columns","Important Columns","International Columns","Middle East","Pakistan Columns","Today Columns","Top Articles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/","name":"The Gulf\u2019s | New Age","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-scaled.png","datePublished":"2026-09-11T08:42:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-11T08:42:07+00:00","description":"The time will come when the decisions of the world will be decided through mutual consultations with Pakistan","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-scaled.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Khaleej-Ka-Niya-Ehad-scaled.png","width":2560,"height":1273,"caption":"The Gulf\u2019s New Age"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/the-gulfs-new-age\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Gulf\u2019s New Age"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/","name":"Bitter Truth","description":"News, Technology, Sports, Health and more","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization","name":"Bitter Truth","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/BT-Logo.3.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/BT-Logo.3.png","width":280,"height":153,"caption":"Bitter Truth"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e31346c22b0671ebcda8fa9ebe76f7e8","name":"Bitter Truth","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bitter Truth"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3085","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3085"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3085\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3087,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3085\/revisions\/3087"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3086"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}