{"id":2620,"date":"2025-10-17T18:53:11","date_gmt":"2025-10-17T18:53:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/?p=2620"},"modified":"2025-10-18T17:54:33","modified_gmt":"2025-10-18T17:54:33","slug":"fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/","title":{"rendered":"Fidelity or Expedience: The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi<\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Shadow of History and the Theatre of Diplomacy: Afghanistan, India, and the Reversal of Time<\/strong>
\nWhen the quill of time first inscribed the name of Afghanistan upon the parchment of history, destiny, too, began to script an unending chronicle of conflict. It is a land that has served alternately as the thoroughfare of empires, the crucible of ideologies, and the chessboard of imperial ambition. Upon this soil \u2014 where for centuries the language of the gun reigned supreme \u2014 diplomacy now dares, hesitantly yet distinctly, to lift its head.<\/p>\n

The Taliban government, once regarded merely as a militant enterprise, now knocks at diplomatic doors, conversing not through the thunder of arms but in the lexicon of political dialogue \u2014 and that, too, in the tongue of its former adversaries. When Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Taliban\u2019s Foreign Minister, sets his foot towards Delhi, it is not merely an official visit; it is an anchor cast into the deep waters of history \u2014 a deliberate attempt to open a new intellectual corridor between two ancient rivals of the Subcontinent: India and Afghanistan.<\/p>\n

There are moments in the long current of history when nations do more than make decisions \u2014 they enter into a dialogue with their own past. The growing proximity between Afghanistan and India evokes, in the hearts of many Pakistanis, a muted anguish. This is the same Pakistan that for four decades bore the Afghan burden as its own \u2014 opening its lands, its homes, its resources in the spirit of brotherhood. And yet today, that very nation is compelled to ask:
\nIs this the reversal of time, or the betrayal of history itself?<\/p>\n

Within the quiet chambers of their hearts, Pakistanis ponder why the very soil for which they sacrificed their economy, their peace, and their blood has now become a refuge for groups such as the TTP and the BLA. Why does that same land, once the emblem of fraternal affection, now send forth caravans of terror and hostility?<\/p>\n

Behind this shifting tableau stands the eternal political rival \u2014 India. The same India that, for decades, sustained every anti-Taliban faction, now extends its hand in the name of conciliation. It is the same India that only months ago tasted humiliation in May\u2019s confrontation with Pakistan, and now, driven by the psychology of vengeance, seeks to wound Islamabad through the corridors of Kabul.<\/p>\n

Thus, while Pakistan contemplates under the shade of its brotherly sentiment, history once again stands at the crossroad of friendship and enmity \u2014 asking why the harvest of love we watered with our blood now yields only thorns against us.<\/p>\n

Amid Pakistan\u2019s traditional closeness with China and Russia\u2019s quiet re-entry into the regional theatre, this proposed visit bears the tremor of a silent yet seismic political shift. It proclaims that the future politics of this region will not be defined by the barrel of a gun, nor by the nobility of the pen, but by the cunning and the calculus of revenge. India, though yet to formally recognise the Taliban regime, seems already to have extended the recognition that begins not in official decrees but in the soft chambers of intent and the subtle phrases of diplomacy. Yet here, such recognition rises not from goodwill, but from the smoke of intrigue and the ashes of ingratitude.<\/p>\n

It is from this very point that the new politics of South Asia begins \u2014 where from the ashes of hostility emerges the first spark of dialogue. This is that rare inflection in history when former foes prepare to shape the architecture of the future, and diplomacy, once mistaken for weakness, becomes \u2014 or rather is wielded as \u2014 the most potent instrument of self-interest.<\/p>\n

South Asia\u2019s political history has ever been a tempest of transformation. The axis of power may have shifted, but the geography of influence has never lain vacant. Afghanistan, throughout, has been both a door and a wall \u2014 a door that connects civilisations, and a wall that demarcates rival ambitions.<\/p>\n

Thus, when news breaks of Amir Khan Muttaqi\u2019s impending visit to India, it is no mere itinerary \u2014 it is a proclamation of a new alignment in the flow of history. For those among us who trusted in Afghan fraternity, this shift cuts deep; it is the ache of watching the labours of brotherhood surrendered to the rancour of expedience.<\/p>\n

Moments such as these are rare upon the scroll of time \u2014 when politics transcends the mere management of power and becomes a dialogue between civilisations, poised between collision and concord. If this proposed visit by the Taliban\u2019s acting foreign minister were a genuine stride toward regional equilibrium, it might have been a noble chapter in the chronicle of brotherhood. Yet, alas \u2014 the Afghan brethren, too, seem ensnared in the cunning web of the shrewd Hindu Brahmin.<\/p>\n

This diplomatic overture is, in essence, an attempt to recalibrate the balance amidst the tug-of-war of regional powers. Pakistan and China both wield considerable influence in Afghanistan \u2014 China through its deep economic roots in the Belt and Road Initiative, and Pakistan through the historic and geographic intimacy that long shaped the Taliban\u2019s path. In this light, Muttaqi\u2019s journey to India suggests a pursuit of multi-vector diplomacy \u2014 a desire to be beholden to no single power. Yet the undercurrent whispers another story.<\/p>\n

After years of United Nations sanctions, this visit becomes possible only through the narrow window of a temporary exemption \u2014 a gesture small in appearance, but vast in its implications.
\n\ufd3f\u0648\u064e\u062a\u0650\u0644\u0652\u0643\u064e \u0627\u0644\u0652\u0623\u064e\u064a\u064e\u0651\u0627\u0645\u064f \u0646\u064f\u062f\u064e\u0627\u0648\u0650\u0644\u064f\u0647\u064e\u0627 \u0628\u064e\u064a\u0652\u0646\u064e \u0627\u0644\u0646\u064e\u0651\u0627\u0633\u0650\ufd3e
\n\u201cAnd such are the days We alternate among mankind.\u201d \u2014 Surah \u0100l \u02bfImr\u0101n (3:140)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Indeed, history\u2019s wheel turns, and the proud learn once more that friendship and betrayal are but alternating seasons in the long year of nations.<\/p>\n

Diplomacy in the Shadow of Power: Afghanistan, India, and the Reawakening of Realpolitik<\/strong>
\nThe journey of Amir Khan Muttaqi to India is not merely the Taliban government\u2019s first formal diplomatic undertaking; it is, in a broader sense, a symbolic re-entry of Afghanistan into the global political consciousness. It is remarkable in its paradox \u2014 for India, to this day, has not formally recognised the Taliban regime, and yet within the corridors of its foreign policy, new windows of engagement have begun to open.<\/p>\n

This visit was rendered possible when the United Nations Security Council granted a partial relaxation of travel restrictions on Taliban leaders. Thus, Muttaqi\u2019s journey is not a ceremonial excursion but the first cautious step toward Afghanistan\u2019s reintegration into the international order. It comes at a moment when China\u2019s influence in Kabul is expanding with calculated speed, Russia has established direct channels of communication, and the United States, after its withdrawal from Bagram Airbase, has retreated into the margins of regional relevance. In this context, Muttaqi\u2019s visit may well signify a reconfiguration of power in South Asia \u2014 a recalibration which, if wisely managed, could serve the region well.<\/p>\n

Though the UN sanctions upon Taliban leaders remain intact, the exemption itself stands as a tacit acknowledgment that the world does not wish to sever its ties entirely. The Taliban, in turn, must seize this diplomatic aperture to declare before the world that they are no longer a purely domestic force, but aspire to present themselves as guarantors of regional stability.<\/p>\n

India \u2014 once the staunchest critic of the Taliban and patron of their opponents \u2014 now seeks a path of dialogue with the very movement it once condemned. This, indeed, is the story of shifting interests and the remapping of geopolitical necessity.<\/p>\n

The Taliban\u2019s foreign ministry has confirmed Muttaqi\u2019s visit, though details remain veiled in discretion. Such reticence itself is a gesture \u2014 a sign that the Taliban, in this new diplomacy, seek to reconcile prudence with dignity, and to send an unspoken message to Pakistan: that silence need not be weakness, nor restraint a form of submission. This quiet diplomacy \u2014 subtle, measured, and deliberate \u2014 is the hallmark of a newfound political maturity, an understanding that power, when expressed in whispers, can echo far louder than when shouted from the ramparts.<\/p>\n

Muttaqi\u2019s journey to India, therefore, is more than a headline; it is an emerging line on the map of South Asian diplomacy. India has not yet granted official recognition to the Taliban regime, yet the warmth perceptible on both sides attests to a simple truth \u2014 that the river of diplomacy never truly runs dry.<\/p>\n

The UN exemption is, in effect, a half-open door \u2014 a hesitant yet meaningful gesture by the global order. Since the Taliban\u2019s return to power in August 2021, this marks the first occasion upon which a minister of the regime undertakes an official visit to a major state. It is not merely diplomacy in motion; it is the first tide of restored credibility, a cautious step in the long pilgrimage toward international acceptance.
\n\ufd3f\u0625\u0650\u0646\u064e\u0651 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0651\u0670\u0647\u064e \u064a\u064f\u0624\u0652\u062a\u0650\u064a \u0645\u064f\u0644\u0652\u0643\u064e\u0647\u064f \u0645\u064e\u0646\u0652 \u064a\u064e\u0634\u064e\u0627\u0621\u064f\ufd3e
\n\u201cIndeed, Allah bestows His dominion upon whom He wills.\u201d \u2014 Surah Al-Baqarah (2:247)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Thus, while formal recognition may still be distant, the acceptance of dialogue \u2014 the beginning of speech after silence \u2014 has already commenced.<\/p>\n

India\u2019s Afghan policy has ever oscillated between two poles: historic mistrust of the Taliban and the pragmatic need to safeguard its investments and influence in Afghanistan. It has publicly maintained a cautious distance, even as it pursued quiet channels of confidence-building behind the veil. It is a policy of relation without recognition, presence without partnership, and proximity without embrace \u2014 an exquisite demonstration of Chanakyan realpolitik.<\/p>\n

After the Pahalgam attack of May 2025, the Indian Foreign Minister, S. Jaishankar, reportedly reached out directly to Muttaqi. That attack was more than a security incident; it reopened old wounds of mistrust across the region. Yet the fact that New Delhi chose dialogue over denunciation \u2014 that it picked up the telephone instead of the sword \u2014 revealed that even amidst enmity, diplomacy still breathes. It was, as one observer put it, a whisper of friendship in the hall of hostility \u2014 a brief diplomatic exhalation that warmed a frozen relationship.<\/p>\n

The significance of this visit grows when placed against the backdrop of China and Russia\u2019s expanding ties with the Taliban. China deepens its presence through investment; Russia reasserts its influence through diplomacy; and Pakistan, as ever, remains the historical axis around which Afghan politics has revolved. For India, this is a moment to establish a new equilibrium \u2014 an opportunity to craft a fresh dialogue with Kabul that might, under the discreet veil of diplomacy, offset the advancing influence of both Pakistan and China.<\/p>\n

Historically, India has aligned itself with every Afghan faction opposed to the Taliban \u2014 from the Northern Alliance to successive Kabul administrations. The Taliban were long perceived as instruments of Pakistan. Yet with their return to power, India has recognised that to ignore the Taliban is to deny Afghan reality itself.<\/p>\n

Delhi\u2019s attitude, therefore, has shifted. It now perceives engagement with the Taliban as a strategic necessity \u2014 not least because it seeks greater latitude to sustain its covert ties with anti-Pakistan elements such as the TTP and the BLA, groups that, under the indulgence of Afghan soil, continue to threaten Pakistan\u2019s peace.<\/p>\n

As early as 2010, it was evident that the Taliban would re-emerge as a central force in Afghan politics. Many nations prepared for that inevitability \u2014 India did not. Yet by 2022, Delhi\u2019s cautious opening of a limited diplomatic mission in Kabul signified the beginning of a reluctant pragmatism. The subsequent meeting between Vikram Misri and Amir Khan Muttaqi in Dubai in 2025, followed by their telephonic engagement, marked a quiet but unmistakable progression \u2014 the slow architecture of trust rebuilt upon the ruins of the past.<\/p>\n

\ufd3f\u0648\u064e\u062c\u064e\u0639\u064e\u0644\u0652\u0646\u064e\u0627 \u0628\u064e\u0639\u0652\u0636\u064e\u0643\u064f\u0645\u0652 \u0644\u0650\u0628\u064e\u0639\u0652\u0636\u064d \u0641\u0650\u062a\u0652\u0646\u064e\u0629\u064b \u0623\u064e\u062a\u064e\u0635\u0652\u0628\u0650\u0631\u064f\u0648\u0646\u064e\ufd3e
\n\u201cAnd We have made some of you a trial for others \u2014 will you then be patient?\u201d \u2014 Surah Al-Furq\u0101n (25:20)<\/strong><\/p>\n

So moves the wheel of history \u2014 grinding slowly, yet inexorably. The visit of Amir Khan Muttaqi may appear a gesture of courtesy, but within it lies the stir of a deeper tide: a quiet contest for influence, a shifting balance of power, and the first cautious murmurings of a new order in South Asia.<\/p>\n

The vacuum that followed President Joe Biden\u2019s declaration of withdrawal from Bagram Airbase became a theatre for new ambitions. Into this void stepped China, Russia, and Iran\u2014each seeking to shape the contours of post-American Afghanistan according to its own design. Beijing advanced with the quiet confidence of economic gravity; Moscow moved with the studied calculation of diplomatic continuity; Tehran, ever the opportunist in regional tides, sought to weave influence through proximity and ideology alike. For New Delhi, however, the encroachment of these powers has been more than a strategic discomfort\u2014it has been a reminder that the geography of influence seldom tolerates absence. Afghanistan has once again become an international chessboard, where every move, however subtle, redraws the map of power in South Asia.<\/p>\n

In this charged milieu, India\u2019s cautiously assertive outreach marks the opening of a new chapter\u2014one that seeks to temper the ascendant influence of China and Pakistan through the art of dialogue rather than confrontation. Amir Khan Muttaqi\u2019s visit to New Delhi is not merely a diplomatic gesture;
\n it is a calculated rejoinder, a signal that India no longer intends to remain a bystander but wishes to reclaim a participatory role in the regional order. His arrival signifies more than the resumption of contact\u2014it embodies a tacit acknowledgement that the Taliban administration has become an unavoidable reality of contemporary geopolitics.<\/p>\n

Although the United Nations sanctions against the Taliban remain formally intact, their engagement with India underscores a quiet yet profound shift: the world, while unwilling to embrace the regime, recognises that it cannot be ignored. India, characteristically prudent, advances with a two-steps-forward, one-step-back rhythm\u2014a cautious diplomacy born of historical experience. Afghanistan, after all, has always offered friendship with one hand and peril with the other. Yet Delhi appears prepared to accept that peril, kindled by the strategic fire of its rivalry with Islamabad.<\/p>\n

Muttaqi\u2019s sojourn thus suggests a new pragmatism: Delhi now seeks tangible engagement rather than ideological opposition\u2014a shift gradual, deliberate, and potentially enduring. Still, to some observers, the emerging proximity between India and the Taliban risks reviving among ordinary Afghans the age-old fear that their land is once more the playground of greater powers. This is not merely a political perception; it is a psychological inheritance. Nations are not always shaped by facts but by the shadows those facts cast upon collective memory.<\/p>\n

Scholars remind us that as early as 2010 the re-emergence of the Taliban was written on the political horizon. The world read the writing; India, however, hesitated. When Kabul fell to the Taliban, New Delhi withdrew its diplomats in haste, yet soon after reopened the discreet channels of communication that are the lifeblood of realpolitik. Of special note was the clandestine visit of Ibrahim Sadr, the Taliban\u2019s deputy interior minister, to India\u2014a quiet encounter that opened a door no communiqu\u00e9 announced. His meeting with the head of RAW symbolised a profound recalibration of India\u2019s diplomatic temperament: from opposition to accommodation, from moral distance to strategic realism.<\/p>\n

Such secret parleys reaffirm a timeless truth of statecraft\u2014that diplomacy often works best when unseen. The regional lexicon of power has acquired new meanings. The Taliban\u2019s tilt toward India, and India\u2019s newfound leniency toward them, is in part the residue of Prime Minister Modi\u2019s humiliation on the world stage following the May Indo-Pakistani confrontation. The age we inhabit is less a time of ideological clarity than of pragmatic convergence, an era that prizes equilibrium over emotion, calculation over conviction. Afghanistan once again stands at the crossroads of history, its soil inscribed by the footsteps of those who come professing friendship but bearing the silent weight of self-interest.<\/p>\n

India\u2019s Taliban policy is the very embodiment of Chanakyan statecraft\u2014cunningly balanced between recognition and repudiation: neither acknowledgment nor denial, neither full partnership nor studied indifference. It is a diplomacy of shadows\u2014presence through aid, influence through conversation. As Delhi sees it, Afghanistan is to be engaged without being endorsed, assisted without being absorbed. It is a policy of restrained activism, where action speaks in whispers and declarations are left unsaid.<\/p>\n

In 2022, the Taliban dispatched a representative to Delhi, and India in turn reopened a modest diplomatic office in Kabul. Yet New Delhi, ever wary of premature symbolism, refrained from granting it the formal status of an embassy. By 2024, reports surfaced of a Taliban envoy quietly stationed at the Mumbai Consulate, though both governments maintained a disciplined silence\u2014an eloquence of omission that has become the preferred idiom of this delicate rapprochement. The continued presence of Taliban representatives in Delhi amounts to an unspoken recognition. India remains publicly mute, aware that certain decisions must mature with time; for words, once spoken, bind more tightly than silence ever could.<\/p>\n

In this silence lies strategy\u2014a Machiavellian poise that shields India from Western displeasure, particularly that of the United States, while keeping the door ajar for regional manoeuvre. The year 2025 witnessed another moment of quiet evolution: the meeting in Dubai between Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri and Amir Khan Muttaqi, followed by a phone conversation in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack. That exchange, like a candle flickering in the frost, testified that even amid political winter, warmth endures.<\/p>\n

China and Russia may enjoy closer relations with the Taliban, but UN restrictions continue to confine the movement\u2019s international reach. The Taliban thus occupy a peculiar space in global diplomacy\u2014conditionally included, never fully embraced. Sanctioned though they remain, the world recognises that no architecture of regional stability can be built without them. In this context, Muttaqi\u2019s visit to India is more than a diplomatic milestone; it is a bridge across isolation, a door left half open in a house of closed corridors.<\/p>\n

India\u2019s stakes in Afghanistan are manifold\u2014economic, defensive, and cultural. With anti-Taliban factions now fragmented and politically irrelevant, New Delhi perceives Kabul not merely as a stage for checking Pakistan\u2019s influence but as an arena for asserting its long-term role in the broader Asian order. From infrastructure to education, India\u2019s investments in Afghanistan are both tangible and symbolic, and rapprochement with the Taliban, however reluctant, has become a political necessity\u2014one shrouded in prudence but driven by purpose.<\/p>\n

Indeed, Muttaqi\u2019s visit represents a deliberate act of equilibrium\u2014a quiet counterweight to the expanding influence of China and Pakistan. Delhi understands that if it withholds engagement, Beijing and Islamabad will dominate Kabul\u2019s corridors, and India\u2019s own proxies will lose relevance. By extending a cautious hand to the Taliban, India declares in essence that Kabul\u2019s gates no longer open in a single direction. It is a symbolic assertion that Delhi has ceased to be a silent observer and now steps forth as an active participant in the great game once again. Muttaqi\u2019s cordial reception, then, is not a mere diplomatic courtesy but a calculated move on the chessboard of power\u2014at once subtle, silent, and strategically eloquent.
\n\u0648\u064e\u0642\u064f\u0644\u0650 \u0671\u0639\u0652\u0645\u064e\u0644\u064f\u0648\u0627\u06df \u0641\u064e\u0633\u064e\u064a\u064e\u0631\u064e\u0649 \u0671\u0644\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0647\u064f \u0639\u064e\u0645\u064e\u0644\u064e\u0643\u064f\u0645\u0652 \u0648\u064e\u0631\u064e\u0633\u064f\u0648\u0644\u064f\u0647\u064f\u06e5 \u0648\u064e\u0671\u0644\u0652\u0645\u064f\u0624\u0652\u0645\u0650\u0646\u064f\u0648\u0646\u064e
\n\u201cAnd say, \u2018Act as you will, for Allah will observe your deeds, and so will His Messenger and the believers.\u2019\u201d \u2014 Surah At-Tawbah (9:105)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Perhaps no verse captures the present moment more aptly: for in the grand theatre of nations, it is not words but deeds that history remembers.<\/strong>
\nSome analysts warn that the budding intimacy between India and the Taliban may well harden in Afghan minds the old, disquieting conviction that their country remains a chessboard upon which hostile neighbours continue to plot. That suspicion \u2014 that New Delhi might use Afghan soil as an instrument against Pakistan \u2014 is not merely political conjecture; it gnaws at the very legitimacy of the Taliban in the court of public opinion. Perception, in the realm of statesmanship, often outweighs fact; and in this regard the optics are plainly not in Delhi\u2019s favour. The greater struggle, therefore, will not only be of geopolitics but of psychology: how to sustain a balance when every gesture is read through the prism of prior grievance.<\/p>\n

The clandestine visit of Ibrahim Sadr, the Taliban\u2019s deputy interior minister, to India was the unadvertised foundation of this delicate choreography \u2014 meetings with senior officials, including, as reported, the head of RAW, that opened a channel of communication whose existence was never proclaimed in press conferences but nonetheless altered the diplomatic arithmetic. That meeting took place at a moment of acute tension between Islamabad and New Delhi, when the region teetered on heightened brinkmanship; the implications of such timing are not trivial. Pakistan has watched these developments with a scrutiny that borders on apprehension; in circumstances so charged, Muttaqi\u2019s voyage may only confirm the worst suspicions and harden them into conviction.<\/p>\n

Ibrahim Sadr is understood to be among the closest confidants of Hibatullah \u2014 not merely a warrior but a man of consequence within the Taliban\u2019s inner councils. His embrace of contact with Indian officials signals an internal shift in decision-making: a discernible movement to recast Taliban diplomacy away from a narrowly theological posture toward one framed by regional exigency. In this new calculus, even the sacrifices rendered by Pakistan \u2014 the fields offered, the homes opened, the decades spent in shared suffering \u2014 count for less than the cold arithmetic of strategic advantage. That readiness to consign past benefactors to the margins and clasp the hand of a formerly avowed adversary is a trenchant testament to the ruthless selectivity of statecraft.<\/p>\n

Indian media has treated this development as a matter of consequence. The Sunday Guardian, among others, framed it as the discreet inauguration of a pragmatic, functioning relationship \u2014 realism triumphing over rhetoric. From Delhi\u2019s vantage the affair is being reinterpreted: not as a return to sentiment but as a recalibration in the mirror of interest. For New Delhi, this is less triumph of reconciliation than of reprise: a cabinet of diplomacy that sees in rapprochement an instrument of retribution as much as of influence.<\/p>\n

Whether this episode will prove to be a transient tactical expedient or the prologue to a lasting partnership, it has already made plain a perennial truth of international affairs \u2014 the doors of diplomacy are seldom bolted for good. Amir Khan Muttaqi\u2019s planned visit is not merely another entry in the ledger of foreign trips; it is a marker of the changing climate in South Asian politics. Where once trenches of creed and conviction criss-crossed the landscape, bridges of convenience are now being constructed. The conversation that has begun between Taliban and Indian interlocutors acknowledges a reality that too often, in politics, is the only master that matters: practicality over principle.<\/p>\n

We stand, then, at a sombre inflection. The valley breezes of Kabul have reached the chambers of Delhi, and with them a savour of Chanakyan guile that may yet rewrite the compass of regional alignment. Where interests and expediencies intersect, nations begin to compose new chapters \u2014 chapters that can, if ill-starred, unspool into fresh nights of calamity across the subcontinent. It would be no small hyperbole to suggest that this proposed visit opens a chapter in the annals of the region wherein words become fewer but meanings more consequential, and where the yawning potential for mischief carries with it the risk of a darkness far more enduring than the diplomatic courtesies that heralded it.<\/p>\n

History reminds us, as an old moral would have it, that those who raise knives in the name of friendship may find their own throats costlier for the kindness. Pakistan, which has long regarded Afghans as neighbours and co-religionists rather than instruments of power, has never sought dominion; it sought only peace and mutual respect. Yet as Kabul\u2019s thresholds appear to open southward toward Delhi, bewilderment and sorrow have fallen upon the gates of Islamabad. It is true \u2014 and this cannot be overstated \u2014 that the language of diplomacy often subjugates feeling to utility. Yet the relationships of peoples are built not merely upon balance sheets of interest but upon histories of fidelity.<\/p>\n

The memory of those who sought refuge on Pakistani soil is still vividly alive: the tents, the hospitality, the bedside vigils of brotherhood that once erased the distance between two nations. To witness, therefore, the flowering of anti-Pakistan movements on Afghan soil \u2014 and to see India cast itself now, with such equanimity, as the quiet director of that game \u2014 provokes a profound national question: is this the Afghanistan for which we offered our best years?<\/p>\n

India\u2019s smiles to the Taliban may yet prove to be a mask of reprisal; the Afghan leadership ought to remember that a hand extended today in the name of convenience can be the same hand offered tomorrow in sacrifice to expediency. The lesson of history is stubborn: daggers of amity are drawn invariably from the enemy\u2019s sheath.<\/p>\n

Pakistan remains a country of dialogue, a people of peace; but it also knows, with the hard wisdom of experience, that where seeds of enmity are sown upon the soil of affection, no season will ever suffice to bloom the flowers of concord. The choice now rests with Kabul: will it honour the ledger of fraternity, or will it barter that debt for the petty profit of geostrategic calculation? History will not remain silent \u2014 it will bear witness to which among its actors tended the lamp of brotherhood and which used its fuel to kindle the flames of hostility.<\/p>\n

Each new dawn brings with it a simple, unrelenting question: will the Taliban\u2019s turn toward Delhi soothe the old wounds of history, or will it be, at best, a temporary contrivance? That question has yet to find its full voice. What unfolds between India and Afghanistan is not merely the forging of bilateral amity; it is the re-mapping of the subcontinent\u2019s collective imagination. It tells us, with bleak candour, that enmity is rarely eternal and that interest is ever fluid.<\/p>\n

Those who once regarded the Taliban as an insular, doctrinal movement now peer through the aperture of realpolitik and find, to their surprise, a silhouette of pragmatism. India, erstwhile the Taliban\u2019s most uncompromising opponent and a supporter of their adversaries, stands today upon the threshold of history speaking, in the measured tongue of diplomacy, of the Taliban\u2019s future. Here is the seam where merciless history takes hands with ruthless politics, and where geography, hitherto mute, is being redrawn in the ink of expedience.<\/p>\n

Muttaqi\u2019s visit may not culminate in treaty or covenant; it may not yield the architecture of durable accord. Yet it will furnish the intellectual scaffolding for decisions to come, and it poses, for those who bled in fraternity, a disquieting question: by closing the doors of dialogue with the country that once sheltered us and opening them with the ancient adversary, in what terms shall our descendants read our epitaph?<\/p>\n

History has taken up the pen once more. It remains to be seen whether the meeting of Delhi and Kabul will inscribe a lament of renewed enmity or the sober preamble to reconciliation. My prayer, stubborn and sincere, is that among the elder statesmen of both countries \u2014 those who weep yet hide their faces in the mantle of disillusionment \u2014 some path may be found to stitch together the riven hearts; that, rather than a fresh annunciation of conquest, we might yet witness the rarer miracle of rapprochement.
\n\u0625\u0650\u0646\u0651\u064e\u0645\u064e\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0652\u0645\u064f\u0624\u0652\u0645\u0650\u0646\u064f\u0648\u0646\u064e \u0625\u0650\u062e\u0652\u0648\u064e\u0629\u064c \u0641\u064e\u0623\u064e\u0635\u0652\u0644\u0650\u062d\u064f\u0648\u0627 \u0628\u064e\u064a\u0652\u0646\u064e \u0623\u064e\u062e\u064e\u0648\u064e\u064a\u0652\u0643\u064f\u0645\u0652 \u0648\u064e\u0671\u062a\u0651\u064e\u0642\u064f\u0648\u0627 \u0671\u0644\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0647\u064e \u0644\u064e\u0639\u064e\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0643\u064f\u0645\u0652 \u062a\u064f\u0631\u0652\u062d\u064e\u0645\u064f\u0648\u0646\u064e
\n\u201cThe believers are nothing else than brothers: so make peace between your brothers, and fear Allah, that ye may receive mercy.\u201d \u2014 Surah al-\u1e24ujur\u0101t (49:10).<\/strong><\/p>\n

If the polity of nations can ever be guided by such a maxim, then perhaps the last word will not be a dirge but a covenant of repair. Yet if realpolitik prevails unchecked, then the script being written today may yet summon a night for the subcontinent from which it will take generations to awake.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Shadow of History and the Theatre of Diplomacy: Afghanistan, India, and the Reversal of Time When the quill of time first inscribed the name of Afghanistan upon the parchment of history, destiny, too, began to script an unending chronicle of conflict. It is a land that has served alternately as the thoroughfare of empires, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2624,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,39,33,24,26,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-afghanistan","category-featured-columns","category-important-columns","category-international-columns","category-pakistan-columns","category-today-columns"],"yoast_head":"\nFidelity or Expedience | The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"If the polity of nations can ever be guided by such a maxim, then perhaps the last word will not be a dirge but a covenant of repair.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fidelity or Expedience | The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"If the polity of nations can ever be guided by such a maxim, then perhaps the last word will not be a dirge but a covenant of repair.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Bitter Truth\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-17T18:53:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-18T17:54:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"693\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"326\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bitter Truth\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bitter Truth\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"21 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bitter Truth\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e31346c22b0671ebcda8fa9ebe76f7e8\"},\"headline\":\"Fidelity or Expedience: The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-17T18:53:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-18T17:54:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/\"},\"wordCount\":4617,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Afghanistan\",\"Featured Columns\",\"Important Columns\",\"International Columns\",\"Pakistan Columns\",\"Today Columns\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/\",\"name\":\"Fidelity or Expedience | The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-17T18:53:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-18T17:54:33+00:00\",\"description\":\"If the polity of nations can ever be guided by such a maxim, then perhaps the last word will not be a dirge but a covenant of repair.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png\",\"width\":693,\"height\":326,\"caption\":\"Fidelity or Expedience: The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fidelity or Expedience: The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Bitter Truth\",\"description\":\"News, Technology, Sports, Health and more\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Bitter Truth\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/BT-Logo.3.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/BT-Logo.3.png\",\"width\":280,\"height\":153,\"caption\":\"Bitter Truth\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e31346c22b0671ebcda8fa9ebe76f7e8\",\"name\":\"Bitter Truth\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bitter Truth\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fidelity or Expedience | The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi","description":"If the polity of nations can ever be guided by such a maxim, then perhaps the last word will not be a dirge but a covenant of repair.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fidelity or Expedience | The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi","og_description":"If the polity of nations can ever be guided by such a maxim, then perhaps the last word will not be a dirge but a covenant of repair.","og_url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/","og_site_name":"Bitter Truth","article_published_time":"2025-10-17T18:53:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-18T17:54:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":693,"height":326,"url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Bitter Truth","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bitter Truth","Est. reading time":"21 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/"},"author":{"name":"Bitter Truth","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e31346c22b0671ebcda8fa9ebe76f7e8"},"headline":"Fidelity or Expedience: The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi","datePublished":"2025-10-17T18:53:11+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-18T17:54:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/"},"wordCount":4617,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png","articleSection":["Afghanistan","Featured Columns","Important Columns","International Columns","Pakistan Columns","Today Columns"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/","name":"Fidelity or Expedience | The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png","datePublished":"2025-10-17T18:53:11+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-18T17:54:33+00:00","description":"If the polity of nations can ever be guided by such a maxim, then perhaps the last word will not be a dirge but a covenant of repair.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Kabul-Shakehand-with-Dehli.png","width":693,"height":326,"caption":"Fidelity or Expedience: The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/fidelity-or-expedience-the-convergence-of-kabul-and-delhi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fidelity or Expedience: The Convergence of Kabul and Delhi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/","name":"Bitter Truth","description":"News, Technology, Sports, Health and more","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#organization","name":"Bitter Truth","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/BT-Logo.3.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/BT-Logo.3.png","width":280,"height":153,"caption":"Bitter Truth"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e31346c22b0671ebcda8fa9ebe76f7e8","name":"Bitter Truth","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0d346e70c8d11329fc7d070f28a7bfb4c20fd0e1e6ea1d2af1d3de255a8793e0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bitter Truth"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2620"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2620\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2622,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2620\/revisions\/2622"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bittertruth.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}